Jim Davenport Discusses NWRA Fellowship Program
Jim Davenport, chief of the Water Division of the Colorado River Commission of Nevada, shared his views of the National Water Resources Association's (NWRA) Fellowship Program. Below is a transcript of the June 29 interview:
NWRA: Your agency, the Colorado River Commission of Nevada, is credited for providing NWRA with our first Fellowship Program participant, McClain Peterson. Can you tell about your agency and why you enrolled McClain in our program?
DAVENPORT: Sure, the Colorado River commission of Nevada is a state agency that is responsible for protecting Nevada's interest in the Colorado River system. We used the fellowship program of your organization for the advantage of one of our professional employees who we want to improve his capability of knowledge of the federal system and of regional political issues that are of interest to the commission. We found the experience that he had to be very advantageous in meeting those objectives.
NWRA: Specifically what did your organization gain through McClain's Washington, D.C. experience?
DAVENPORT: The chief benefit I would put in the nature of training and development. A person working in the kinds of water policy issues that we work in needs to have a good understanding of the issues that are important to other interests, the political process in which those interests work to meet the objective that they have and a program like the fellowship program at NWRA is perfect for that staff development.
NWRA: Would you consider enrolling additional employees in the Fellowship Program?
DAVENPORT: Oh yes, as money and time permits we definitely would, and I would recommend it to other agencies that have employees that are at the junior to middle grade of management to participate in, very much.
NWRA: McClain was able to spend about six weeks with us here in Washington, do you think that is the optimum amount of time? What would you suggest?
DAVENPORT: Well, I know from speaking with him he didn't feel it was long enough. He liked it so much he would have liked to have stayed. From our perspective, I think it was about right for an initial experience in Washington. I think that for one to take the next step it should probably be longer perhaps a six-month duration, but for a first experience I thought it was just about right.
NWRA: He was a tremendous help for us and people still ask about him up on the Hill and certainly within the House Resources Committee. So from our point of view it was wonderful having him here.
|